RepeatProof turns fragmented NCR, CAPA, complaint, inspection and audit history into a source-linked review your team can use. AI assists the search. Your quality professionals decide.
Run a controlled synthetic example. RepeatProof searches the approved history, explains why each record surfaced and asks a quality professional to accept, mark maybe or reject it.
Final inspection measured the bore diameter at 25.13 mm against an approved specification of 25 ±0.05 mm.
above the upper specification limit
Potentially related records
Why each record surfaced
Previous actions and evidence
Select Find related history to prepare the synthetic review.
When records sit across different systems, names and formats, investigators repeat searches, miss previous actions and rebuild context the organisation has already paid to learn.
Comparable NCRs, CAPAs, complaints, inspection exceptions and audit findings are difficult to retrieve together.
Quality professionals spend scarce time reconstructing evidence instead of evaluating what it means.
Earlier containment, corrective action and effectiveness evidence may not reach the next decision.
RepeatProof narrows the search and makes the reasoning inspectable. It does not make material quality decisions.
Search the agreed record set for potentially comparable issues and previous actions.
Present matching characteristics, source excerpts, confidence and limitations.
A named quality professional accepts, marks maybe or rejects each suggestion.
Export selected history and evidence gaps for use in the authoritative quality process.
RepeatProof may retrieve history, explain similarity and prepare a review pack. It does not approve root cause, disposition, corrective-action effectiveness, product release or closure.
Test one priority CAPA or NCR workflow against an approved historical dataset. RepeatProof retrieves related records, previous actions and evidence gaps, while named customer reviewers judge every result.
Median time to prepare an evidence pack, measured before and during the engagement.
The share of surfaced records accepted as relevant by the named quality reviewer.
The share of required evidence present when an investigation reaches first review.
Accept, maybe and reject decisions remain visible; RepeatProof never converts a suggestion into an approval.
CAPA/NCR history is the first commercial proof point. Inspection and audit are offered when the evidence volume, review bottleneck and named decision owner support a credible scope.
Find potentially related events, previous actions and evidence gaps before an investigator commits hours to manual searching.
Compare typed results with approved limits and surface repeated exceptions without automating acceptance or release.
Explore inspection reviewConnect clause-linked evidence, related findings and overdue actions while the authorised auditor retains judgement.
Explore audit reviewThe workspace prepares source-linked evidence for the people and processes that already hold authority.
| Approach | What remains true | RepeatProof role |
|---|---|---|
| Your QMS | Remains the authoritative system of record | RepeatProof reads the agreed history and prepares evidence for review |
| Spreadsheet or BI | Aggregates selected fields and charts | RepeatProof preserves the record-level source and why each item was surfaced |
| Generic AI assistant | Drafts from the context it receives | RepeatProof provides a bounded review workflow with named human decisions |
| RepeatProof | Finds related history, previous actions and evidence gaps | Your quality professionals decide relevance, root cause, disposition and closure |
Every engagement begins with an agreed baseline and evaluation plan. Customer outcomes are published only with customer review and approval.
Share four details about the current workload. We will review the history available, the decision boundary and whether a readiness review or pilot is a credible next step.